Skip to main content
Kveck
About AI

How our services use AI

We build AI advisors and tools for finding and applying for funding. The Kveck advisor in CanWeApply answers questions from expert knowledge we have selected. SøkTilskudd, SøkStøtte and SkatteFUNN-hjelpen write application drafts. All of them use large language models, but for different jobs. This page sets out the principles that apply across them.

Last updated 9 September 2026

Model choice

Today we use Claude from Anthropic. We review the alternatives on an ongoing basis and switch if circumstances change.

What happens to the data

Anthropic is contractually committed not to train models on what we or our users submit, or on the model's responses. They delete inputs and outputs after 30 days. We have also turned off the option for user data to be piped back to Anthropic for model improvement.

What the AI does

In the application tools it writes drafts. It structures the text according to what the funding body asks for, adjusts tone, and pulls facts from your organisation or company profile so you don't write the same thing over and over. In the advisor it answers questions about one funding scheme, from sources we selected in advance. It tells you what decides the matter, and what you need to clarify before you invest the time.

What the AI does not do

It makes no decisions. It does not submit applications without you reading and approving them. It does not judge who “deserves” funding. The funding body rules on your project. You sign, and that's how it should be.

Bias and limitations

Language models reflect the data they're trained on, and training data is rarely evenly distributed. In practice that means our services perform unevenly across user groups. It typically affects small organisations outside the major cities, less common subject areas, and users writing in Nynorsk (Norway's second written standard).

The concrete effects vary between services. See SøkTilskudd: AI-assisted application writing for an example.

How you can help

Let us know when a draft or an answer misses the mark. Thumbs-down where the service offers it, or an email to marte@kveck.no with a concrete example. Patterns we hear about become test cases for the next round of improvements.